CANDY CANDY BOOTLEGS!!
Real fans never buy the bootlegs!!
CANDY CANDY Reborn top
They killed Candice White Ardray!

キャンディ・キャンディ事件最高裁判決後のできごと
Since the judgment on the case of Candy Candy misappropriation
(Jul. 28. 08 updated)

 日本マンガ学会理事・長谷邦夫によるセカンドレイプ 
 Nagatani Kunio, the old man who raped Candice White Ardray
(Apr. 20. 08 updated)
台湾でいがらしゆみこ自ら『キャンディ・キャンディ』モドキ商売 
2007, Igarashi Yumiko tried to market new character "Lady Lady" goods in Taiwan.
The "new characters" are very like Candy, Anthony and Terrus.
(Jul. 28, 08 updated)
『キャンディキャンディ』東映アニメ版お蔵入りの現状
The reason why TOEI cannot broadcast "CANDY CANDY " again.
キャンディ・キャンディ関連裁判一覧
(Feb. 11. 07)
『キャンディ・キャンディ』の著作権に関する講談社の見解
(Jan. 03. 07)
小説『キャンディキャンディ』の著作権者について
関連リンク 
ブログ エンコーディングはUTF-8です
Infringement of the copyright and the trademark! (May 19. 02 updated)
Official Books (Nov. 10. 07 updated)
Official VHS and LD (May 12. 02 updated)
Manga CD-ROM
Poor-quality "Luxury fine art prints" (Apr. 10. 03. updated)

偽版画ワールド

マンガジャパンの原作者無視テレカ
(Mar. 15. 03 updated)

What is CANDY CANDY bootleg?

A bootleg is a product featuring licensed material without permission.
The copyright holders have not approved the product and do not receive royalties from the product.
The presence of bootleg products is quite common in China.

But Candy Candy bootleg products are different from those.

Manga Candy Candy's copyright holders are Ms. Mizuki Kyoko and Ms. Igarashi Yumiko. The visual appearance of the characters was done by the manga artist, but the background and history of each character was done by Ms. Mizuki.
And the trademark holder of Candy Candy is TOEI Animation.

But the greedy manga artist infringed on the original authors' copyright and TOEI Animation's trademark right. Some Candy Candy merchandise were consented and produced by the manga artist only. Many companies were deceived by her, and the contract which carries out illegal business was made.

IOW, one of the copyright holders constituted the copyright infringement.

Oct. 25. 2001, Ms. Mizuki Kyoko has won the Candy Candy copyright dispute extensively at the highest court judgment, the Supreme Court in Japan.
It means those Candy Candy merchandise were consented and produced by the manga artist only are all illegal ones.

Though the evil manga artist lost the suit, neither an apology nor expiation is done yet.
On the contrary, there is a suspicion that she still produces illegal merchandise on the foreign market.
Because of those illegal products, it is impossible to release whole series on videos and DVDs in the world, even in Japan.


Save Candy Union



...Fake fans buy the bootlegs.

20997 counter since Jun. 01. 2006

“感覚的”マンガ論 NHKシリーズ こころをよむ 日本漫画家協会理事京都精華大学マンガ学部学部長。マンガ学科教授京都国際マンガミュージアム研究センター長牧野圭一子Mizuki Kyoko講談社kodansha著作権侵害事件(株)アップルワン著作権問題判例ニューズレターサンブライト株式会社京都精華大学表現研究機構マンガ文化研究所主催フォーラム「マンガは誰のものか!?」知的所有権判例株式会社ダンエンタープライズマンガ学会理事・長谷邦夫Nagayani Kunioマンガ学会第3回著作権部会Manga 知的財産権判決『封印作品の謎2』anime東映TOEI著作権研究シンポ吉村和真理事大垣女子短期大学・椙山女学園大学講師コミック・マーケット準備会代表表現研究機構マンガ文化研究所所長評論家、静アート神戸松蔭女子学院大学非常勤講師現代マンガ図書館館長秋田孝宏、馬場巌、牧野圭一、堤健太郎、三木宮彦、米沢嘉博、尾崎博彦、内記稔夫、龍村全、牛木理一、安藤健二Mizuki Kyoko ジョージィLady Georgie井沢満カバヤ食品日本アニメーション東映アニメーション商標権審判タニイ、ダンエンタープライズ、サンブライト、アースプロジェクトカバヤ佐川急便事件村中志津枝(鈴賀レニ玉皇朝出版産経新聞山中湖いがらしゆみこ美術館ニセ版画